311 All Changeable [N] - Demonic Tutor2024-03-29T09:38:20Zhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/forum/topics/311-all-changeable-n?groupUrl=nomic&commentId=3440403%3AComment%3A11049&groupId=3440403%3AGroup%3A10314&feed=yes&xn_auth=noThomas David Baker NO
Dan Bar…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-17:3440403:Comment:111072010-02-17T21:31:50.001ZThomas David Bakerhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/ThomasDavidBaker
Thomas David Baker NO<br />
Dan Barrett NO<br />
Tiffany Leek NO<br />
Gary Lynch PROPOSER<br />
Ross Miles YES<br />
Kieran Symington YES<br />
Ben Titmarsh NO<br />
Paul Young NO<br />
<br />
Gary scores ROUND((311 - 291) * (3 / 8)) (Rule 202) - 10 (Rule 206) = -2<br />
Everyone except Ross scores 1 for voting within 24 hours (Rule 303).
Thomas David Baker NO<br />
Dan Barrett NO<br />
Tiffany Leek NO<br />
Gary Lynch PROPOSER<br />
Ross Miles YES<br />
Kieran Symington YES<br />
Ben Titmarsh NO<br />
Paul Young NO<br />
<br />
Gary scores ROUND((311 - 291) * (3 / 8)) (Rule 202) - 10 (Rule 206) = -2<br />
Everyone except Ross scores 1 for voting within 24 hours (Rule 303). yestag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-17:3440403:Comment:110822010-02-17T13:39:05.396Zross mileshttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/rossmiles
yes
yes I guess as ben is against hav…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-17:3440403:Comment:110692010-02-17T11:07:41.169ZGary Lynchhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/GaryLynch
I guess as ben is against having all rules be changeable then there is no point me trying to reword.<br />
<br />
Still waiting for Ross. <br></br><br></br><cite>Thomas David Baker said:</cite><blockquote><div>I think the intent of your rule was clear and people have voted on the intent. So no I don't think you get a do-over. The rules allow for revisions of proposals and if the voting hasn't closed I think we must therefore allow revision of voting. So if you want to reword it and ask everyone to think again…</div>
</blockquote>
I guess as ben is against having all rules be changeable then there is no point me trying to reword.<br />
<br />
Still waiting for Ross. <br/><br/><cite>Thomas David Baker said:</cite><blockquote><div>I think the intent of your rule was clear and people have voted on the intent. So no I don't think you get a do-over. The rules allow for revisions of proposals and if the voting hasn't closed I think we must therefore allow revision of voting. So if you want to reword it and ask everyone to think again before Ross votes then by all means do so. But that doesn't mean you can have an entirely new proposal only that you can argue for your existing proposal and amend it in suggested ways.</div>
</blockquote> Just for the record - I vote…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-17:3440403:Comment:110642010-02-17T10:19:02.926ZKieran Symingtonhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/KieranSymington
Just for the record - I vote yes (and it's not just a pity yes - I think getting rid of the inability to change immutable rules would be good for the game)
Just for the record - I vote yes (and it's not just a pity yes - I think getting rid of the inability to change immutable rules would be good for the game) I think the intent of your ru…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-17:3440403:Comment:110592010-02-17T07:12:09.216ZThomas David Bakerhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/ThomasDavidBaker
I think the intent of your rule was clear and people have voted on the intent. So no I don't think you get a do-over. The rules allow for revisions of proposals and if the voting hasn't closed I think we must therefore allow revision of voting. So if you want to reword it and ask everyone to think again before Ross votes then by all means do so. But that doesn't mean you can have an entirely new proposal only that you can argue for your existing proposal and amend it in suggested ways.
I think the intent of your rule was clear and people have voted on the intent. So no I don't think you get a do-over. The rules allow for revisions of proposals and if the voting hasn't closed I think we must therefore allow revision of voting. So if you want to reword it and ask everyone to think again before Ross votes then by all means do so. But that doesn't mean you can have an entirely new proposal only that you can argue for your existing proposal and amend it in suggested ways. Ok its starting to turn into…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-16:3440403:Comment:110492010-02-16T17:30:38.637ZGary Lynchhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/GaryLynch
Ok its starting to turn into a no fest.<br />
<br />
Ross still to vote on the last proposal and I guess that makes it his turn, unless cause mine was illegal I get to make another one?
Ok its starting to turn into a no fest.<br />
<br />
Ross still to vote on the last proposal and I guess that makes it his turn, unless cause mine was illegal I get to make another one? Anyways, no.tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-16:3440403:Comment:110482010-02-16T17:29:00.642ZDan Barretthttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/DanBarrett
Anyways, no.
Anyways, no. I'm not sure what is going on…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-16:3440403:Comment:110472010-02-16T17:25:03.498ZTiff Leekhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/TiffLeek
I'm not sure what is going on, exactly, so will resort to my standard needmoredata No.
I'm not sure what is going on, exactly, so will resort to my standard needmoredata No. My suggestion was to make 103…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-16:3440403:Comment:110452010-02-16T17:19:14.458ZThomas David Bakerhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/ThomasDavidBaker
My suggestion was to make 103 mutable so that someone could repeal or alter it as a future move <i>at which point</i> all rules would then be mutable.<br />
<br />
Kieran's version would work but I guess with these no votes that isn't going to happen.<br />
<br />
I vote "no" for purely tactical reasons even though I would actually like this rule change to be enacted.
My suggestion was to make 103 mutable so that someone could repeal or alter it as a future move <i>at which point</i> all rules would then be mutable.<br />
<br />
Kieran's version would work but I guess with these no votes that isn't going to happen.<br />
<br />
I vote "no" for purely tactical reasons even though I would actually like this rule change to be enacted. notag:demonictutor.ning.com,2010-02-16:3440403:Comment:110412010-02-16T16:45:06.928ZPaul Younghttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/PaulYoung
no
no