Cube Masters Series | Building The Cube | Artifacts - Demonic Tutor2024-03-28T14:39:35Zhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/forum/topics/cube-masters-series-building-3?feed=yes&xn_auth=noI know there is no colourless…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-22:3440403:Comment:305082011-02-22T15:35:15.676ZGlenn Goldsworthyhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/GlennGoldsworthy
I know there is no colourless guys in at the mo but the Kozilec is all kinds of sauce with ramp or reinanimator
I know there is no colourless guys in at the mo but the Kozilec is all kinds of sauce with ramp or reinanimator UPDATED 22 FEBRUARYtag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-22:3440403:Comment:304862011-02-22T14:25:19.079Zwvhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/wv
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;" class="font-size-7">UPDATED 22 FEBRUARY</span></strong>
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;" class="font-size-7">UPDATED 22 FEBRUARY</span></strong> Thanks Charlie - I've been wa…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-21:3440403:Comment:301482011-02-21T09:48:38.714Zwvhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/wv
<p>Thanks Charlie - I've been waiting for your feedback!!! Where have you been??!!! :D</p>
<p><br></br> <cite>Charlie Grover said:</cite></p>
<blockquote cite="http://demonictutor.ning.com/forum/topics/cube-masters-series-building-3#3440403Comment29970"><div><p>I like all the masticores and lodestone golem, I wouldnt cut those. Lightning greaves should be in as its one of the best cards for midrange/aggro against BU control. Triskelion has been underwhelming me recently, so i cut it. Would rather…</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks Charlie - I've been waiting for your feedback!!! Where have you been??!!! :D</p>
<p><br/>
<cite>Charlie Grover said:</cite></p>
<blockquote cite="http://demonictutor.ning.com/forum/topics/cube-masters-series-building-3#3440403Comment29970"><div><p>I like all the masticores and lodestone golem, I wouldnt cut those. Lightning greaves should be in as its one of the best cards for midrange/aggro against BU control. Triskelion has been underwhelming me recently, so i cut it. Would rather have duplicant by a significant margin.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ive onlt had phyrexian revoker in for like 1 draft, but in that draft he was surprisingly good, and given that your cube is powered and mine isnt its probably better in yours. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I might cut lotus petal, I really dont like it without comboing out.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As a general point, ill have a look through my cube later and see if I can see anything you have obviously missed.</p>
</div>
</blockquote> I like all the masticores and…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-20:3440403:Comment:299702011-02-20T12:39:40.086ZCharlie Groverhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/CharlieGrover
<p>I like all the masticores and lodestone golem, I wouldnt cut those. Lightning greaves should be in as its one of the best cards for midrange/aggro against BU control. Triskelion has been underwhelming me recently, so i cut it. Would rather have duplicant by a significant margin.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ive onlt had phyrexian revoker in for like 1 draft, but in that draft he was surprisingly good, and given that your cube is powered and mine isnt its probably better in yours. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I might…</p>
<p>I like all the masticores and lodestone golem, I wouldnt cut those. Lightning greaves should be in as its one of the best cards for midrange/aggro against BU control. Triskelion has been underwhelming me recently, so i cut it. Would rather have duplicant by a significant margin.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ive onlt had phyrexian revoker in for like 1 draft, but in that draft he was surprisingly good, and given that your cube is powered and mine isnt its probably better in yours. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I might cut lotus petal, I really dont like it without comboing out.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As a general point, ill have a look through my cube later and see if I can see anything you have obviously missed.</p> Ooops, I totally agree on Lod…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-18:3440403:Comment:296442011-02-18T09:14:44.087ZSimon O'Keeffehttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/sokeeffe
Ooops, I totally agree on Lodestone Golem. I was getting it confused with Lodestone Myr!<br></br>
<br></br>
<cite>Thea Steele said:</cite><br />
<blockquote cite="http://demonictutor.ning.com/forum/topics/cube-masters-series-building-3?commentId=3440403%3AComment%3A29492&xg_source=activity#3440403Comment29468"><div><p style="text-align: left;">Probably an oversight, but Jitte!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Lodestone Golem is actually an extremely general card. Aggro…</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
Ooops, I totally agree on Lodestone Golem. I was getting it confused with Lodestone Myr!<br/>
<br/>
<cite>Thea Steele said:</cite><br />
<blockquote cite="http://demonictutor.ning.com/forum/topics/cube-masters-series-building-3?commentId=3440403%3AComment%3A29492&xg_source=activity#3440403Comment29468"><div><p style="text-align: left;">Probably an oversight, but Jitte!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Lodestone Golem is actually an extremely general card. Aggro can drop it when they are ahead on board, and delay a wrath. Control can drop it when their opponent is slow and keep them playing only one spell a turn. If you can make it asymmetrical, great, but it really doesn't have to be. It's always asymmetrical because one of you has a 5/3, anyway :)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
</div>
</blockquote> Any thoughts on Lightning Gre…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-18:3440403:Comment:296052011-02-18T07:52:58.938ZAllan Chonghttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/AllanChong
Any thoughts on Lightning Greaves as opposed to one of the swords, or maybe bonehoard?
Any thoughts on Lightning Greaves as opposed to one of the swords, or maybe bonehoard? What's the rationale behind c…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-17:3440403:Comment:295092011-02-17T20:33:25.700ZEugene Hwanghttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/EugeneHwang
What's the rationale behind cutting signets but leaving behind the more broken fast mana?
What's the rationale behind cutting signets but leaving behind the more broken fast mana? Oversights on both Jitte and…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-17:3440403:Comment:294922011-02-17T17:58:17.934Zwvhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/wv
Oversights on both Jitte and Mana Crypt!!<br />
<br />
I'm disgusted with myself!! Argh! :)<br />
<br />
Adjusted accordingly.
Oversights on both Jitte and Mana Crypt!!<br />
<br />
I'm disgusted with myself!! Argh! :)<br />
<br />
Adjusted accordingly. Probably an oversight, but Ji…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-17:3440403:Comment:294682011-02-17T17:51:18.633ZThea Steelehttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/TheaSteele
<p style="text-align: left;">Probably an oversight, but Jitte!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Lodestone Golem is actually an extremely general card. Aggro can drop it when they are ahead on board, and delay a wrath. Control can drop it when their opponent is slow and keep them playing only one spell a turn. If you can make it asymmetrical, great, but it really doesn't have to be. It's always asymmetrical because one of you has a 5/3, anyway :)…</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Probably an oversight, but Jitte!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Lodestone Golem is actually an extremely general card. Aggro can drop it when they are ahead on board, and delay a wrath. Control can drop it when their opponent is slow and keep them playing only one spell a turn. If you can make it asymmetrical, great, but it really doesn't have to be. It's always asymmetrical because one of you has a 5/3, anyway :)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I think that Masticores are all worthwhile, and your heavy reanimation theme in black works well with them (except for Molten-Tail, which is really for aggro and excellent anyway). If you have to cut one for Duplicant, probably the original is the first to go.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I'd fit in Mana Crypt as well- just so unfair. It's better than the land fetch artifacts, IMO.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p> There's no space for storm in…tag:demonictutor.ning.com,2011-02-17:3440403:Comment:292602011-02-17T11:40:12.535Zwvhttp://demonictutor.ning.com/profile/wv
<p>There's no space for storm in a 360, but I don't think this justifies taking out Jar - it is completely and utterly busted even outside of storm!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Planeswalkers that are in:</p>
<p>Jace x 2</p>
<p>Sarkhan x2</p>
<p>Garruk</p>
<p>Lliliana</p>
<p>Ajani Vengeant</p>
<p>Elspeth x 2</p>
<p>Gideon</p>
<p>Koth</p>
<p>Chandra Nalaar</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Clasp just might be good enough! I'll have a look at how many other cards use counters - that would seal the deal!</p>
<p><br></br> <cite>Dan…</cite></p>
<p>There's no space for storm in a 360, but I don't think this justifies taking out Jar - it is completely and utterly busted even outside of storm!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Planeswalkers that are in:</p>
<p>Jace x 2</p>
<p>Sarkhan x2</p>
<p>Garruk</p>
<p>Lliliana</p>
<p>Ajani Vengeant</p>
<p>Elspeth x 2</p>
<p>Gideon</p>
<p>Koth</p>
<p>Chandra Nalaar</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Clasp just might be good enough! I'll have a look at how many other cards use counters - that would seal the deal!</p>
<p><br/> <cite>Dan Barrett said:</cite></p>
<blockquote cite="http://demonictutor.ning.com/forum/topics/cube-masters-series-building-3?commentId=3440403%3AComment%3A29235&xg_source=msg_com_forum#3440403Comment29235"><div><p>Will there be enough support for a storm deck? If no, then memory jar should prob be cut.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Will all/most of the planeswalkers make it in? If so, Contagion Clasp is pretty hot. (also I LOVE this card)</p>
</div>
</blockquote>