Chesham PTQ Results

[Daniel Royde]

Top 8:

Jack Ho,
Chifley,
Stu,
Eugene,
Rob Wagner (Leeds)
+3 others I don't know

Quarters:

Jack beat Eugene
Stu beat don't know
Rob beat Chifley
Don't know beat Don't know

Stu beat Jack,
Rob lost to don't know.

Stu vs don't know = I left...?

112 turn out, well run event in a nice venue-

Don't forget to say good things about it to help encourage Wizards to give them more PTQs.

[Daniel Royde]

Yes, the game has randomness. There are plenty of games to play that don't.

Please can everyone stop moaning about how a game with randomness in it, has randomness.

This is how I feel everytime someone complains about being land/ whatever screwed (and the story isn't funny, then it's ok)
http://www.funnyphotos.net.au/images/sympathy-card-your-story-has-t...

Feel free to use this on me when I'm guilty.





Dan Barrett said:

Dude, you can't say it isn't.

I opened 2 Venser's Journal, 2 lands, and 2 other unplayable rares while I saw others get 3/4 bombs.

Come on...

James Mills said:

Sealed is not luck based - stop saying this!!!

Also are you honestly telling me that constructed isn't luck based after just coming out of a format where poeple keep complaining about losing to turn 3 SOLA.




Dan Barrett said:

Fair point Gary - but playing good players is much more valuable in constructed than the much more luck-based sealed format, no?

Will be attending Gravesend and London for sure, just busy atm so couldn't make Chesham yday...

[Dan Barrett]

Alright, I whine a bit too much about sealed, fair.