Tags:
Tooth and nail... read the thread. 6 mana is a pisstake for the deck
Dan Barrett said:Also it costs 6, is that not a bit slow?
Not so irrelevant - I think Duplicant is not a bad choice against the Rubin zoo decks.
How so? You're supposed to win the game when you play Tooth and Nail, am I wrong?
If not, then the deck is shit.
James Mills said:Not so irrelevant - I think Duplicant is not a bad choice against the Rubin zoo decks.
So if you play a duplicant removing a baneslayer then that's bad because it wasn't tooth and nail?
Warren Vonk said:How so? You're supposed to win the game when you play Tooth and Nail, am I wrong?
If not, then the deck is shit.
James Mills said:Not so irrelevant - I think Duplicant is not a bad choice against the Rubin zoo decks.
So you're playing Duplicant for one deck in the meta that runs 3 Baneslayers?
I meh in your general direction, sir.
James Mills said:So if you play a duplicant removing a baneslayer then that's bad because it wasn't tooth and nail?
Warren Vonk said:How so? You're supposed to win the game when you play Tooth and Nail, am I wrong?
If not, then the deck is shit.
James Mills said:Not so irrelevant - I think Duplicant is not a bad choice against the Rubin zoo decks.
Actually not the worst idea ive ever seen. It also makes your late game green fetchlands relevant. Hmmmmm
© 2025 Created by Thomas David Baker. Powered by